[Scip] Performance of Nehalem machine
Anthony Presley
anthony at resolution.com
Tue Apr 20 18:54:18 MEST 2010
Hi all!
I've tried solving an MPS problem (about 24MB in size), with 4011
variables and 65108 constraints.
In trying to benchmark scip, I installed scip on to two servers, along
with CLP (from subversion).
One machine has these characteristics: (machine1)
(2) Xeon 5570 Nehalem CPU's @ 2.93Ghz
24GB of RAM
The other has these: (machine2)
(1) Xeon E5410 @ 2.33Ghz
8GB of RAM
Neither machine is doing anything other than running scip (and whatever
background processing the kernel does).
However, in this case, when getting to say, a gap of 4724.87%, machine1
looks like this:
time | node | left |LP iter| mem |mdpt |frac |vars |cons |ccons|cols
|rows |cuts |confs|strbr| dualbound | primalbound | gap
t 0.8s| 1 | 0 | 0 | 60M| 0 | - |2866 | 46k| 46k| 0
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -- | 1.681391e+07 | Inf
42.9s| 1 | 0 | 25711 | 82M| 0 | 353 |2866 | 46k| 46k|2866
| 46k| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.481961e+05 | 1.681391e+07 |4728.86%
b43.3s| 1 | 0 | 26093 | 82M| 0 | - |2866 | 46k| 46k|2866
| 46k| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.481961e+05 | 1.680000e+07 |4724.87%
And machine2 (to get to the same gap) looks like this:
time | node | left |LP iter| mem |mdpt |frac |vars |cons |ccons|cols
|rows |cuts |confs|strbr| dualbound | primalbound | gap
t 0.7s| 1 | 0 | 0 | 60M| 0 | - |2866 | 46k| 46k| 0
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -- | 1.681391e+07 | Inf
32.5s| 1 | 0 | 25711 | 82M| 0 | 353 |2866 | 46k| 46k|2866
| 46k| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.481961e+05 | 1.681391e+07 |4728.86%
b32.8s| 1 | 0 | 26093 | 82M| 0 | - |2866 | 46k| 46k|2866
| 46k| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.481961e+05 | 1.680000e+07 |4724.87%
More specifically, the older, slower, processor solves (up to this
point) almost 10 seconds faster.
I was expecting the opposite, out of a processor that is significantly
more expensive.
Any ideas what's going on?
Both scip's were built using "make LPS=clp" and that's it. Coin was
built using "make".
Both boxes are running an up to date CentOS 5.4
Thanks!
--
Anthony
More information about the Scip
mailing list