[Scip] General lower and upper bound

[Rostislav Stanek]

Dear Michael,
thank you for your response. I was just not sure that I did it in the 
most correct way.
Best regards
Rostislav



Dne 15.5.2013 17:00, michael.winkler at zib.de napsal(a):
> Hi Rostislav,
>
> it is totally valid to use a linear constraint for setting lower and upper
> bounds, especially if you want to do this in problem stage. In
> (pre-)solving you can also use SCIPupdateLocalLowerbound() or
> SCIPupdateCutoffbound() do update your bounds respectively.(Note that the
> cutoffbound needs to be better than the already known one.)
>
> Best, Michael
>
>> Dear SCIP community,
>> I have a simple question: What is the best way to set the general lower
>> and the general upper bound? Is it OK if I use a general constraints
>> created via “SCIPcreateConsLinear”? This solution works but I am not
>> sure if I should do it in such a way.
>> I thank your for all tips.
>> Yours faithfully
>> Rostislav Stanek
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scip mailing list
>> Scip at zib.de
>> http://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip
>>