[SCIP] FORCE BRANCHING WITH CONTINUOUS VARIABLES

[Gerald Gamrath]

Hi Diego,

> thank you for your quick answer. I thought it was enough with the high 
> ENFOPRIORITY. Now it is working!!!
good to hear that it is working!

> So, I guess in my particular problem any positive values for 
> ENFOPRIORITY and CHECKPRIORITY should work.
>
> By the way, in cons_camediff of the binpacking example, is there any 
> reason to have high CHECKPRIORITY since the CONSCHECK is defined as NULL?
>
You are right, if the CONSCHECK is defined as NULL, the CHECKPRIORITY 
does not matter.

Best,
Gerald