[SCIP] vbcfile 4.0.1

Marc Pfetsch pfetsch at mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de
Sat Nov 18 17:29:29 CET 2017



Dear Uwe,

the output of vbcfiles is indeed different:

1. The output for maximization problems should be correct now
(previously it produced wrong output).

2. There is a message for each new solution ("A ...").


The order should be "A ..." to indicate that a solution has been found.
As a consequence, the bounds are sometimes updated afterwards (but not
always, i.e. if the solution does not improve the bound) and a message
is printed ("L ..." or "U ...").

Best

Marc



On 16/11/17 12:01, Gotzes, Uwe Dr. wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> I have observed, that the vbcfile is generated in a different manner
> than before in scip 4.0.1.
> 
>  
> 
> Here is a small example
> 
>  
> 
> #TYPE: COMPLETE TREE
> 
> #TIME: SET
> 
> #BOUNDS: SET
> 
> #INFORMATION: STANDARD
> 
> #NODE_NUMBER: NONE
> 
> 00:00:00.17 N 0 1 3
> 
> 00:00:00.17 I 1 \inode:\t1
> (000000000075B280)\idepth:\t0\nvar:\t-\nbound:\t-100000000000000000000.000000
> 
> 00:00:00.18 L 10.000000
> 
> 00:00:00.18 A 1 \nfound better solution: 1.000000
> 
> 00:00:00.18 P 1 14
> 
> 00:00:00.18 L 1.000000
> 
> 00:00:00.18 P 1 11
> 
> 00:00:00.18 A 1 \nfound better solution: 0.000000
> 
> 00:00:00.18 P 1 14
> 
> 00:00:00.18 L 0.000000
> 
>  
> 
> The occurrence of L and A is new, correct? I assume that A indicates,
> that a better upper bound was found. Hence I would expect a line with
> the indicator U (upper bound) before a line with the indicator A
> appears. Or do I get something wrong?
> 
>  
> 
> Best
> 
> Uwe
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scip mailing list
> Scip at zib.de
> https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip
> 


More information about the Scip mailing list