[SCIP] documentation and source disagree on valid stages for SCIPgetNLimSolsFound()?

[Ross Anderson]

Yep, I now see (it was right there...)

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:47 PM Stefan Vigerske <svigerske at gams.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> before the checkStage() call, there is code that handles the stages
> init, problem, and transforming:
>
>      if( SCIPgetStage(scip) < SCIP_STAGE_TRANSFORMED)
>         return 0;
>
> This implementation may be a bit unusual, but it should be ok the way it
> is.
>
> Stefan
>
> On 14/12/2023 21:18, Ross Anderson wrote:
> > See line 1774 of this file:
> >
> > https://www.scipopt.org/doc/html/scip__solvingstats_8c_source.php
> >
> > The comment lists three more stages than the call to SCIPcheckStage()
> > below: init, problem, and transforming.
> >
> > Based on the comment and the source agreeing in SCIPgetNSolsFound(), I
> > would assume that source is correct and the comment is wrong.
> >
> > This does not impact me/google, it just appears to be a typo.
> >
> > Ross
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scip mailing list
> > Scip at zib.de
> > https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scip mailing list
> Scip at zib.de
> https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.zib.de/pipermail/scip/attachments/20231215/839e078a/attachment.html>