<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Hello Tony,</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>about your first point. It is the responsibility of the
      separators to check the minefficacy because some constraint
      handlers might want to add cuts to the sepastore that are
      necessary to enforce their constraints but are violated below
      minefficacy.<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Best,<br>
      Leona</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/14/19 4:56 PM, Wang, Tony Congqian
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:e1e57038acfd43219e57ad75cd3f648a@rwth-aachen.de">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
      <div id="divtagdefaultwrapper"
style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;"
        dir="ltr">
        <p>Hello,</p>
        <p><br>
        </p>
        <p>Sorry, I missed something in the code about the second point.
          The question has been resolved.</p>
        <p><br>
        </p>
        <p>Best Regards,</p>
        <p>Tony<br>
        </p>
        <p><br>
        </p>
      </div>
      <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
      <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt"
          face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>Von:</b> Scip
          <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:scip-bounces@zib.de"><scip-bounces@zib.de></a> im Auftrag von Wang, Tony Congqian
          <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tony.wang@rwth-aachen.de"><tony.wang@rwth-aachen.de></a><br>
          <b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 14. August 2019 16:49:48<br>
          <b>An:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:scip@zib.de">scip@zib.de</a><br>
          <b>Betreff:</b> Re: [SCIP] cuts.c</font>
        <div> </div>
      </div>
      <div>
        <style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
        <div id="divtagdefaultwrapper"
style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;"
          dir="ltr">
          <p>Hello Leona,</p>
          <p><br>
          </p>
          <p>thanks for the quick reply. Thats also what I was thinking.
            I have two other questions:</p>
          <p><br>
          </p>
          <ol style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
            <li>Why is minefficacy not used in SCIPsepastoreApplyCuts? <span>SCIPsetIsFeasPositive(set,
                SCIProwGetLPEfficacy(cut, set, stat, lp))</span> is
              called anyway, so I guess it isn't the separators task to
              check for minefficacy, so shouldn't there be
              <span>SCIPsetIsFeasPositive(set, SCIProwGetLPEfficacy(cut,
                set, stat, lp) - "<b>minefficacy</b>" )</span></li>
            <li><span>Objectparallelism is not calculated when not using
                debug-mode since <span>
                  checkRowObjprod</span>() is deactivated in
                non-debug-mode. Is this intended (since
                objectparallelism seems to not give a lot of improvement
                and is appearently slow to calculate)? What makes me
                wonder though is that
                <span>SCIProwGetObjParallelism()</span> is the only
                function that calls <span>checkRowObjprod</span>() and
                <span>SCIProwGetObjParallelism() is only referenced by
                  selectCuts().</span> So why even bother disabling the
                function when the user can disable the use by setting
                <span style="background-color:white;">objparalweight</span>
                = 0</span></li>
          </ol>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Best Regards,</div>
          <div>Tony<br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
        <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt"
            face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>Von:</b> Scip
            <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:scip-bounces@zib.de"><scip-bounces@zib.de></a> im Auftrag von Leona Gottwald
            <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gottwald@zib.de"><gottwald@zib.de></a><br>
            <b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 14. August 2019 12:43:51<br>
            <b>An:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:scip@zib.de">scip@zib.de</a><br>
            <b>Betreff:</b> Re: [SCIP] cuts.c</font>
          <div> </div>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p>Hello Tony,</p>
          <p><br>
          </p>
          <p>thanks for your question, indeed that does not make sense
            and was not intended.</p>
          <p><br>
          </p>
          <p>The code will be changed to <span>add the
              dircutoffdistweight instead of the objparalweight in the
              next release which is consistent with the behavior for
              locally valid cuts.</span></p>
          <p><span><br>
            </span></p>
          <span>Best,<br>
          </span>
          <p><span>Leona</span></p>
          <p><span><br>
            </span></p>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/19 12:48 AM, Wang, Tony
            Congqian wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote type="cite"
            cite="mid:ba14e3e1c56f47f8a3a6f4a800a55d4a@rwth-aachen.de">
            <style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
            <div id="divtagdefaultwrapper"
style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;"
              dir="ltr">
              <p>Hello community,</p>
              <p><br>
              </p>
              <p>I have a question regarding cuts.c:2563 -- efficacyfac
                += objparalweight; --. I couldn't find the reasoning of
                this addition anywhere. It is done, when
                dircutoffdistance is not calculated (either due to
                missing incumbent or
                <span>dircutoffdistweight</span> == 0). So I would
                think, that in the case that the incucmbent is missing,
                efficacy would get more weight, but I can't yet see the
                reasoning behind adding objparalweight on it.</p>
              <p><br>
              </p>
              <p>Best Regards,</p>
              <p>Tony<br>
              </p>
            </div>
            <br>
            <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
            <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Scip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Scip@zib.de" moz-do-not-send="true">Scip@zib.de</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip" moz-do-not-send="true">https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip</a>
</pre>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Scip mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Scip@zib.de">Scip@zib.de</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip">https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>