[Soplex] Reporting results for soplex

[Ernesto Casablanca (PGR)]

Hi Ambros,

Thank you for the insight! The statistics reported with the `-q` are perfect for my use case, so I will be using it.

If I compare the results I get with the ones in https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10107-019-01444-6/MediaObjects/10107_2019_1444_MOESM1_ESM.pdf, I can still see some mismatches (e.g.,  app1-2 or atlanta-ip), but I assume it is due to the parameters I'm using and the fact that Soplex's version has changed.  The vast majority are the same.
Also, it may be worth checking the method `numRefinements`: unless I'm misusing it (which is likely), I think the number reported is incorrect (it seems to always be 0).

Cheers,
Ernesto Casablanca
________________________________
From: Ambros Gleixner <ambros.gleixner at HTW-Berlin.de>
Sent: 05 March 2025 11:33
To: Ernesto Casablanca (PGR) <E.Casablanca2 at newcastle.ac.uk>; soplex at zib.de <soplex at zib.de>
Subject: Re: [Soplex] Reporting results for soplex

⚠ External sender. Take care when opening links or attachments. Do not provide your login details.

Hi Ernesto,

have you tried the -q option on the command line?  Are the statistics in
in this table sufficient?

Best,
Ambros

Am 03.03.2025 um 17:43 schrieb Ernesto Casablanca (PGR):
> Hi all,
>
> I am running some LP benchmarks, and I would like to compare
> SoPlex's performance with other approaches only considering exact solutions.
> For this reason, I'm launching the tool with the following command line
> frags: `--readmode=1 -f0 -o0`.
> Then, from the output I need to collect data about the result and, most
> importantly, some collateral information such as number of refinements
> and the precision the solver operated at last (if precision boosting
> occurred).
> Comparing the output I get from the standalone tool against the
> information I collect using SoPlex as a c++ library, I noticed some
> mismatches that may arise from the fact I'm not interpreting the output
> correctly.
>
> Since I do not want to miss-represent your work, what do you suggest
> would be the best way of recording those two metrics or any other metric
> you think is relevant given the configuration?
> Can I collect them from the standard output, or do I necessarily need to
> use SoPlex as a library?
>
> I have attached an example output I would like to collect the metrics from.
>
> Thanks,
> /Ernesto Casablanca/
>
> _______________________________________________
> SoPlex mailing list
> SoPlex at zib.de
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flistserv.zib.de%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsoplex&data=05%7C02%7CE.Casablanca2%40newcastle.ac.uk%7C0b0384d46d43465336f808dd5bd98f37%7C9c5012c9b61644c2a91766814fbe3e87%7C1%7C0%7C638767713185248279%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yM%2FXSw0oaF%2B9rbWYDkspW4qCd4GZL7WwxJfZ%2Buc1KWk%3D&reserved=0<https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/soplex>

--
Prof. Dr. Ambros Gleixner - HTW & Zuse Institute Berlin
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.htw-berlin.de%2Fhochschule%2Fpersonen%2Fperson%2F%3Feid%3D12822&data=05%7C02%7CE.Casablanca2%40newcastle.ac.uk%7C0b0384d46d43465336f808dd5bd98f37%7C9c5012c9b61644c2a91766814fbe3e87%7C1%7C0%7C638767713185267848%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hGrGuljlaJ%2FzzCOS47vK20AF5CkPOySydhevdGRvXa0%3D&reserved=0<https://www.htw-berlin.de/hochschule/personen/person/?eid=12822>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.zib.de/pipermail/soplex/attachments/20250306/75eeb925/attachment.html>