[Scip] Call to adjustedUb in SCIPvarChgUbOriginal causing solve failures

[michael.winkler@zib.de]

Hi,

the restriction to 1e20 is correct, because SCIP handles all value >= 1e20
as infinity.

Best, Michael

> Hi all, I've recently updated the Microsoft .NET wrapper that I wrote a
> couple
> of years ago to allow .NET Applications so that it could be used SCIP 2.0
> and
> Soplex 1.5. I restructured the projects to use the new Developer Studio
> Solution
> files that were made available (thanks Wei Huang) and after fixing up a
> few
> things that I was expecting all seems to be working as expected apart from
> one
> problem. When I try to set an upper bound using SCIPvarChgUbOriginal() to
> 1e100
> the new call to adjustedUb() overrides the incoming value and restricts
> the
> upper bound to 1e20. This causes my previously working solve to now fail.
> I'm
> not sure if it's a case that I have previously been relying on something
> that
> was incorrect in the older versions or if this is a "real" issue with the
> current SCIP version. I can supply more details on my test if it helps but
> at
> the macro level I just wanted to first check with the the mailing list
> colective
> wisdom as to whether the adjustedUb() interaction is kosher? Any insights
> out
> there ?
> Fergal 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scip mailing list
> Scip at zib.de
> http://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip
>