[SCIP] Post, non-convex QCQP
Benjamin Müller
benjamin.mueller at zib.de
Mon Mar 18 11:51:11 CET 2019
Dear Ning,
nonconvex QCQPs are in general very challenging, so even relatively
small problems can take a long time to solve.
For global solvers like SCIP, it is crucial to have variable bounds that
are as tight as possible. Probably, a first thing to check is whether
the variables are (at least) bounded in your model.
I am no expert in using the OPTI toolbox, but is it possible to write
your problem into an LP (or CIP) file and send it to me? Then I could
have a look and we might think about suitable settings for your QCQPs.
Best,
Benjamin
On 3/15/19 6:13 PM, Ning Wang wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am a PHD student from university of Alberta. I am writing to you for
> some technical support.
>
> Recently, I am solving a quadratically constrained quadratic program
> problem based on MATLAB OPTI toolbox. The optimization problem has
> 12 optimization variables and 30 non-convex constrains. The available
> SCIP MATLAB code ("scip.mexw64, v4.0.0") cannot reach a satisfactory
> performance, which displayed ''solving was interrupted [time limit
> reached]'' even if I set the maximum time as up to 8 hours.
>
> Is it because the defaulted parameters of SCIP are not improperly set?
> Then how can I improve the settings? Or is it because SCIP has limited
> capabilities in solving non-convex QCQP problem? Is there more efficient
> code ( better MATLAB ) to my problem? I will be very grateful for your
> help!
>
> Thank you for your time!
>
> Best regards
> Ning
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scip mailing list
> Scip at zib.de
> https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip
>
--
______________________________
Benjamin Müller
Zuse Institute Berlin
Takustr. 7, 14195 Berlin
benjamin.mueller at zib.de
+49 30 841 85-195
More information about the Scip
mailing list