[SCIP] Early branching in SCIP
Benjamin Müller
benjamin.mueller at zib.de
Wed Apr 17 14:47:06 CEST 2019
Dear Anna,
I have not much experience with early branching in SCIP and thus I hope
that someone from the mailing list could correct me if I say something
wrong.
As far as I understand it, the only problem with returning
SCIP_DIDNOTRUN in your pricer plug-in is that you need to ensure that at
least one constraint handler marks the current LP solution of the
restricted master problem to be infeasible and branches. If there is no
branching candidate then you want to continue with pricing, right?
So couldn't you check the LP solution of the restricted master problem
in your pricer plug-in for feasibility? If the point is feasible (but
not optimal!) then you need to continue with pricing. If the point is
infeasible then this should mean that either cons_integer or your
constraint handler is going to branch (assuming that you are not doing
Farkas pricing right now).
I don't know exactly what happens if you return SCIP_DIDNOTRUN.
Probably, SCIP is checking the feasibility of the current LP solution
and if necessary calls the enforcement methods of the constraint handlers.
Best,
Benjamin
On 4/9/19 1:45 PM, Anna Melchiori wrote:
> Good morning SCIP team,
>
> I have implemented a Branch and Price approach with a dedicated pricing
> routine and a branching strategy (in addition to the standard 0-1
> branching rule).
> To speed up the pricing I want to test an early branching strategy so
> I'm returning the pointer result=SCIP_DIDNOTRUN in my reduced cost
> methods whenever a certain criteria is hit.
> At this point I would like the constraint handler (mine first then the
> standard 0-1) to be called to check feasibility of the approximate
> solution and in case branch. If no candidate is found I'd like to go
> back and solve to optimality the LP by column generation.
>
> Could you please explain me what are the next steps SCIP implements
> whenever a SCIP_DIDNOTRUN is given from the pricer?
> So far this is not completely clear to me as I am getting different
> behaviors (check method for primal/pseudo solutions, node is directly
> discarded, no branch call)
>
> Thank you so much!!
> Have a nice day
> Anna
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scip mailing list
> Scip at zib.de
> https://listserv.zib.de/mailman/listinfo/scip
>
--
______________________________
Benjamin Müller
Zuse Institute Berlin
Takustr. 7, 14195 Berlin
benjamin.mueller at zib.de
+49 30 841 85-195
More information about the Scip
mailing list